Biography

ACD301인증시험공부자료 - ACD301유효한공부문제

Itexamdump ACD301 최신 PDF 버전 시험 문제집을 무료로 Google Drive에서 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mYEkkNiTatVbP7n4_0uL854II3q7Tqw8

Itexamdump의 Appian인증 ACD301시험덤프자료는 IT인사들의 많은 찬양을 받아왔습니다.이는Itexamdump의 Appian인증 ACD301덤프가 신뢰성을 다시 한번 인증해주는것입니다. Appian인증 ACD301시험덤프의 인기는 이 시험과목이 얼마나 중요한지를 증명해줍니다. Itexamdump의 Appian인증 ACD301덤프로 이 중요한 IT인증시험을 준비하시면 우수한 성적으로 시험을 통과하여 인정받는 IT전문가로 될것입니다.

덤프는 구체적인 업데이트주기가 존재하지 않습니다. 하지만 저희는 수시로 Appian ACD301 시험문제 변경을 체크하여Appian ACD301덤프를 가장 최신버전으로 업데이트하도록 최선을 다하고 있습니다. Appian ACD301덤프를 구매하면 1년간 업데이트될떼마다 최신버전을 구매시 사용한 메일로 전송해드립니다.

>> ACD301인증시험 공부자료 <<

ACD301유효한 공부문제 & ACD301유효한 덤프

Appian ACD301시험은 Itexamdump 에서 출시한Appian ACD301덤프로 도전하시면 됩니다. Appian ACD301 덤프를 페펙트하게 공부하시면 시험을 한번에 패스할수 있습니다. 구매후 일년무료 업데이트 서비스를 제공해드리기에Appian ACD301시험문제가 변경되어도 업데이트된 덤프를 받으면 가장 최신시험에 대비할수 있습니다.

최신 Lead Developer ACD301 무료샘플문제 (Q24-Q29):

질문 # 24
You are required to configure a connection so that Jira can inform Appian when specific tickets change (using a webhook). Which three required steps will allow you to connect both systems?

• A. Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials.
• B. Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status.
• C. Create a Web API object and set up the correct security.
• D. Create a new API Key and associate a service account.
• E. Give the service account system administrator privileges.

정답：A,C,D

설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Configuring a webhook connection from Jira to Appian requires setting up a mechanism for Jira to push ticket change notifications to Appian in real-time. This involves creating an endpoint in Appian to receive the webhook and configuring Jira to send the data. Appian's Integration Best Practices and Web API documentation provide the framework for this process.
Option A (Create a Web API object and set up the correct security):
This is a required step. In Appian, a Web API object serves as the endpoint to receive incoming webhook requests from Jira. You must define the API structure (e.g., HTTP method, input parameters) and configure security (e.g., basic authentication, API key, or OAuth) to validate incoming requests. Appian recommends using a service account with appropriate permissions to ensure secure access, aligning with the need for a controlled webhook receiver.
Option B (Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials):
This is essential. In Jira, you need to set up a webhook by providing the Appian Web API's URL (e.g., https://<appian-site>/suite/webapi/<web-api-name>) and the credentials or authentication method (e.g., API key or basic auth) that match the security setup in Appian. This ensures Jira can successfully send ticket change events to Appian.
Option C (Create a new API Key and associate a service account):
This is necessary for secure authentication. Appian recommends using an API key tied to a service account for webhook integrations. The service account should have permissions to process the incoming data (e.g., write to a process or data store) but not excessive privileges. This step complements the Web API security setup and Jira configuration.
Option D (Give the service account system administrator privileges):
This is unnecessary and insecure. System administrator privileges grant broad access, which is overkill for a webhook integration. Appian's security best practices advocate for least-privilege principles, limiting the service account to the specific objects or actions needed (e.g., executing the Web API).
Option E (Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status):
This is incorrect for a webhook scenario. Webhooks are push-based, where Jira notifies Appian of changes. Creating an integration object for periodic polling (pull-based) is a different approach and not required for the stated requirement of Jira informing Appian via webhook.
These three steps (A, B, C) establish a secure, functional webhook connection without introducing unnecessary complexity or security risks.
Reference:
The three required steps that will allow you to connect both systems are:
A . Create a Web API object and set up the correct security. This will allow you to define an endpoint in Appian that can receive requests from Jira via webhook. You will also need to configure the security settings for the Web API object, such as authentication method, allowed origins, and access control.
B . Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials. This will allow you to set up a webhook in Jira that can send requests to Appian when specific tickets change. You will need to specify the URL of the Web API object in Appian, as well as any credentials required for authentication.
C . Create a new API Key and associate a service account. This will allow you to generate a unique token that can be used for authentication between Jira and Appian. You will also need to create a service account in Appian that has permissions to access or update data related to Jira tickets.
The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:
D . Give the service account system administrator privileges. This is not required and could pose a security risk, as giving system administrator privileges to a service account could allow it to perform actions that are not related to Jira tickets, such as modifying system settings or accessing sensitive data.
E . Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status. This is not required and could cause unnecessary overhead, as creating an integration object from Appian to Jira would involve polling Jira for ticket status changes, which could consume more resources than using webhook notifications. Verified Reference: Appian Documentation, section "Web API" and "API Keys".

 

질문 # 25
You need to generate a PDF document with specific formatting. Which approach would you recommend?

• A. Use the PDF from XSL-FO Transformation smart service to generate the content with the specific format.
• B. Use the Word Doc from Template smart service in a process model to add the specific format.
• C. There is no way to fulfill the requirement using Appian. Suggest sending the content as a plain email instead.
• D. Create an embedded interface with the necessary content and ask the user to use the browser "Print" functionality to save it as a PDF.

정답：A

설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:As an Appian Lead Developer, generating a PDF with specific formatting is a common requirement, and Appian provides several tools to achieve this. The question emphasizes "specific formatting," which implies precise control over layout, styling, and content structure.
Let's evaluate each option based on Appian's official documentation and capabilities:
* A. Create an embedded interface with the necessary content and ask the user to use the browser "Print" functionality to save it as a PDF:This approach involves designing an interface (e.g., using SAIL components) and relying on the browser's native print-to-PDF feature. While this is feasible for simple content, it lacks precision for "specific formatting." Browser rendering varies across devices and browsers, and print styles (e.g., CSS) are limited in Appian's control. Appian Lead Developer best practices discouragerelying on client-side functionality for critical document generation due to inconsistency and lack of automation. This is not a recommended solution for a production-grade requirement.
* B. Use the PDF from XSL-FO Transformation smart service to generate the content with the specific format:This is the correct choice. The "PDF from XSL-FO Transformation" smart service (available in Appian's process modeling toolkit) allows developers to generate PDFs programmatically with precise formatting using XSL-FO (Extensible Stylesheet Language Formatting Objects). XSL-FO provides fine- grained control over layout, fonts, margins, and styling-ideal for "specific formatting" requirements.
In a process model, you can pass XML data and an XSL-FO stylesheet to this smart service, producing a downloadable PDF. Appian's documentation highlights this as the preferred method for complex PDF generation, making it a robust, scalable, and Appian-native solution.
* C. Use the Word Doc from Template smart service in a process model to add the specific format:This option uses the "Word Doc from Template" smart service to generate a Microsoft Word document from a template (e.g., a .docx file with placeholders). While it supports formatting defined in the template and can be converted to PDF post-generation (e.g., via a manual step or external tool), it's not a direct PDF solution. Appian doesn't natively convert Word to PDF within the platform, requiring additional steps outside the process model. For "specific formatting" in a PDF, this is less efficient and less precise than the XSL-FO approach, as Word templates are better suited for editable documents rather than final PDFs.
* D. There is no way to fulfill the requirement using Appian. Suggest sending the content as a plain email instead:This is incorrect. Appian provides multiple tools for document generation, including PDFs, as evidenced by options B and C. Suggesting a plain email fails to meet the requirement of generating a formatted PDF and contradicts Appian's capabilities. Appian Lead Developer training emphasizes leveraging platform features to meet business needs, ruling out this option entirely.
Conclusion: The PDF from XSL-FO Transformation smart service (B) is the recommended approach. It provides direct PDF generation with specific formatting control within Appian's process model, aligning with best practices for document automation and precision. This method is scalable, repeatable, and fully supported by Appian's architecture.
References:
* Appian Documentation: "PDF from XSL-FO Transformation Smart Service" (Process Modeling > Smart Services).
* Appian Lead Developer Certification: Document Generation Module (PDF Generation Techniques).
* Appian Best Practices: "Generating Documents in Appian" (XSL-FO vs. Template-Based Approaches).

 

질문 # 26
Your Appian project just went live with the following environment setup: DEV > TEST (SIT/UAT) > PROD.
Your client is considering adding a support team to manage production defects and minor enhancements, while the original development team focuses on Phase 2. Your client is asking you for a new environment strategy that will have the least impact on Phase 2 development work. Which optioninvolves the lowest additional server cost and the least code retrofit effort?

• A. Phase 2 development work stream: DEV > TEST (SIT/UAT) > PROD Production support work stream: DEV > TEST2 (SIT/UAT) > PROD
• B. Phase 2 development work stream: DEV > TEST (SIT) > STAGE (UAT) > PROD Production support work stream: DEV > TEST2 (SIT/UAT) > PROD
• C. Phase 2 development work stream: DEV > TEST (SIT/UAT) > PROD Production support work stream: DEV2 > TEST (SIT/UAT) > PROD
• D. Phase 2 development work stream: DEV > TEST (SIT) > STAGE (UAT) > PROD Production support work stream: DEV2 > STAGE (SIT/UAT) > PROD

정답：A

설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:The goal is to design an environment strategy that minimizes additional server costs and code retrofit effort while allowing the support team to manage production defects and minor enhancements without disrupting the Phase 2 development team. The current setup (DEV > TEST (SIT/UAT) > PROD) uses a single development and testing pipeline, and the client wants to segregate support activities from Phase 2 development. Appian's Environment Management Best Practices emphasize scalability, cost efficiency, and minimal refactoring when adjusting environments.
* Option C (Phase 2 development work stream: DEV > TEST (SIT/UAT) > PROD; Production support work stream: DEV > TEST2 (SIT/UAT) > PROD):This option is the most cost-effective and requires the least code retrofit effort. It leverages the existing DEV environment for both teams but introduces a separate TEST2 environment for the support team's SIT/UAT activities. Since DEV is already shared, no new development server is needed, minimizing server costs. The existing code in DEV and TEST can be reused for TEST2 by exporting and importing packages, with minimal adjustments (e.g., updating environment-specific configurations). The Phase 2 team continues using the original TEST environment, avoiding disruption. Appian supports multiple test environments branching from a single DEV, and the PROD environment remains shared, aligning with the client's goal of low impact on Phase 2. The support team can handle defects and enhancements in TEST2 without interfering with development workflows.
* Option A (Phase 2 development work stream: DEV > TEST (SIT) > STAGE (UAT) > PROD; Production support work stream: DEV > TEST2 (SIT/UAT) > PROD):This introduces a STAGE environment for UAT in the Phase 2 stream, adding complexity and potentially requiring code updates to accommodate the new environment (e.g., adjusting deployment scripts). It also requires a new TEST2 server, increasing costs compared to Option C, where TEST2 reuses existing infrastructure.
* Option B (Phase 2 development work stream: DEV > TEST (SIT) > STAGE (UAT) > PROD; Production support work stream: DEV2 > STAGE (SIT/UAT) > PROD):This option adds both a DEV2 server for the support team and a STAGE environment, significantly increasing server costs. It also requires refactoring code to support two development environments (DEV and DEV2), including duplicating or synchronizing objects, which is more effort than reusing a single DEV.
* Option D (Phase 2 development work stream: DEV > TEST (SIT/UAT) > PROD; Production support work stream: DEV2 > TEST (SIT/UAT) > PROD):This introduces a DEV2 server for the support team, adding server costs. Sharing the TEST environment between teams could lead to conflicts (e.g., overwriting test data), potentially disrupting Phase 2 development. Code retrofit effort is higher due to managing two DEV environments and ensuring TEST compatibility.
Cost and Retrofit Analysis:
* Server Cost:Option C avoids new DEV or STAGE servers, using only an additional TEST2, which can often be provisioned on existing hardware or cloud resources with minimal cost. Options A, B, and D require additional servers (TEST2, DEV2, or STAGE), increasing expenses.
* Code Retrofit:Option C minimizes changes by reusing DEV and PROD, with TEST2 as a simple extension. Options A and B require updates for STAGE, and B and D involve managing multiple DEV environments, necessitating more significant refactoring.
Appian's recommendation for environment strategies in such scenarios is to maximize reuse of existing infrastructure and avoid unnecessary environment proliferation, making Option C the optimal choice.
References:Appian Documentation - Environment Management and Deployment, Appian Lead Developer Training - Environment Strategy and Cost Optimization.

 

질문 # 27
As part of your implementation workflow, users need to retrieve data stored in a third-party Oracle database on an interface. You need to design a way to query this information.
How should you set up this connection and query the data?

• A. Configure a timed utility process that queries data from the third-party database daily, and stores it in the Appian business database. Then use a!queryEntity using the Appian data source to retrieve the data.
• B. Configure an expression-backed record type, calling an API to retrieve the data from the third-party database. Then, use a!queryRecordType to retrieve the data.
• C. Configure a Query Database node within the process model. Then, type in the connection information, as well as a SQL query to execute and return the data in process variables.
• D. In the Administration Console, configure the third-party database as a "New Data Source." Then, use a queryEntity to retrieve the data.

정답：D

설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:As an Appian Lead Developer, designing a solution to query data from a third-party Oracle database for display on an interface requires secure, efficient, and maintainable integration. The scenario focuses on real-time retrieval for users, so the design must leverage Appian's data connectivity features. Let's evaluate each option:
* A. Configure a Query Database node within the process model. Then, type in the connection information, as well as a SQL query to execute and return the data in process variables:The Query Database node (part of the Smart Services) allows direct SQL execution against a database, but it requires manual connection details (e.g., JDBC URL, credentials), which isn't scalable or secure for Production. Appian's documentation discourages using Query Database for ongoing integrations due to maintenance overhead, security risks (e.g., hardcoding credentials), and lack of governance. This is better for one-off tasks, not real-time interface queries, making it unsuitable.
* B. Configure a timed utility process that queries data from the third-party database daily, and stores it in the Appian business database. Then use a!queryEntity using the Appian data source to retrieve the data:
This approach syncs data daily into Appian's business database (e.g., via a timer event and Query Database node), then queries it with a!queryEntity. While it works for stale data, it introduces latency (up to 24 hours) for users, which doesn't meet real-time needs on an interface. Appian's best practices recommend direct data source connections for up-to-date data, not periodic caching, unless latency is acceptable-making this inefficient here.
* C. Configure an expression-backed record type, calling an API to retrieve the data from the third-party database. Then, use a!queryRecordType to retrieve the data:Expression-backed record types use expressions (e.g., a!httpQuery()) to fetch data, but they're designed for external APIs, not direct database queries. The scenario specifies an Oracle database, not an API, so this requires building a custom REST service on the Oracle side, adding complexity and latency. Appian's documentation favors Data Sources for database queries over API calls when direct access is available, making this less optimal and over-engineered.
* D. In the Administration Console, configure the third-party database as a "New Data Source." Then, use a!queryEntity to retrieve the data:This is the best choice. In the Appian Administration Console, you can configure a JDBC Data Source for the Oracle database, providing connection details (e.g., URL, driver, credentials). This creates a secure, managed connection for querying via a!queryEntity, which is Appian's standard function for Data Store Entities. Users can then retrieve data on interfaces using expression-backed records or queries, ensuring real-time access with minimal latency. Appian's documentation recommends Data Sources for database integrations, offering scalability, security, and governance-perfect for this requirement.
Conclusion: Configuring the third-party database as a New Data Source and using a!queryEntity (D) is the recommended approach. It provides direct, real-time access to Oracle data for interface display, leveraging Appian's native data connectivity features and aligning with Lead Developer best practices for third-party database integration.
References:
* Appian Documentation: "Configuring Data Sources" (JDBC Connections and a!queryEntity).
* Appian Lead Developer Certification: Data Integration Module (Database Query Design).
* Appian Best Practices: "Retrieving External Data in Interfaces" (Data Source vs. API Approaches).

 

질문 # 28
Your client's customer management application is finally released to Production. After a few weeks of small enhancements and patches, the client is ready to build their next application. The new applicationwill leverage customer information from the first application to allow the client to launch targeted campaigns for select customers in order to increase sales. As part of the first application, your team had built a section to display key customer information such as their name, address, phone number, how long they have been a customer, etc. A similar section will be needed on the campaign record you are building. One of your developers shows you the new object they are working on for the new application and asks you to review it as they are running into a few issues. What feedback should you give?

• A. Provide guidance to the developer on how to address the issues so that they can proceed with their work.
• B. Point the developer to the relevant areas in the documentation or Appian Community where they can find more information on the issues they are running into.
• C. Ask the developer to convert the original customer section into a shared object so it can be used by the new application.
• D. Create a duplicate version of that section designed for the campaign record.

정답：C

설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:The scenario involves reusing a customer information section from an existing application in a new application for campaign management, with the developer encountering issues. Appian's best practices emphasize reusability, efficiency, and maintainability, especially when leveraging existing components across applications.
* Option B (Ask the developer to convert the original customer section into a shared object so it can be used by the new application):This is the recommended approach. Converting the original section into a shared object (e.g., a reusable interface component) allows it to be accessed across applications without duplication. Appian's Design Guide highlights the use of shared components to promote consistency, reduce redundancy, and simplify maintenance. Since the new application requires similar customer data (name, address, etc.), reusing the existing section-after ensuring it is modular and adaptable-addresses the developer's issues while aligning with the client's goal of leveraging prior work. The developer can then adjust the shared object (e.g., via parameters) to fit the campaign context, resolving their issues collaboratively.
* Option A (Provide guidance to the developer on how to address the issues so that they can proceed with their work):While providing guidance is valuable, it doesn't address the root opportunity to reuse existing code. This option focuses on fixing the new object in isolation, potentially leading to duplicated effort if the original section could be reused instead.
* Option C (Point the developer to the relevant areas in the documentation or Appian Community where they can find more information on the issues they are running into):This is a passive approach and delays resolution. As a Lead Developer, offering direct support ora strategic solution (like reusing components) is more effective than redirecting the developer to external resources without context.
* Option D (Create a duplicate version of that section designed for the campaign record):
Duplication violates Appian's principle of DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) and increases maintenance overhead. Any future updates to customer data display logic would need to be applied to multiple objects, risking inconsistencies.
Given the need to leverage existing customer information and the developer's issues, converting the section to a shared object is the most efficient and scalable solution.
References:Appian Design Guide - Reusability and Shared Components, Appian Lead Developer Training - Application Design and Maintenance.

 

질문 # 29
......

Itexamdump 질문 풀은 실제시험 변화의 기반에서 스케줄에 따라 업데이트 합니다. 만일 Appian ACD301테스트에 어떤 변화가 생긴다면, 적중율이 항상 98% 이상을 유지 할 수 있도록 2일간의 근무일 안에 제품을 업데이트 하도록 합니다. Itexamdump는 고객들이 테스트에 성공적으로 합격 할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 업데이트 된 버전을 구매후 서비스로 제공해드립니다. 시험에서 불합격받으셨는데 업데이트가 힘든 상황이면 덤프비용을 환불해드립니다.

ACD301유효한 공부문제: https://www.itexamdump.com/ACD301.html

Appian ACD301인증시험 공부자료 시험문제커버율이 높아 덤프에 있는 문제만 조금의 시간의 들여 공부하신다면 누구나 쉽게 시험패스가능합니다, 저희 IT전문가들은 높은 정확도를 보장하는 최고의 품질을 자랑하는 Appian ACD301시험지도서를 발췌하였습니다.이는 실제시험에 대비하여 전문적으로 제작된 시험준비 공부자료로서 높은 적중율을 보장하는 시험준비 필수자료입니다, Itexamdump ACD301유효한 공부문제덤프는 고객님께서 필요한것이 무엇인지 너무나도 잘 알고 있답니다, Appian ACD301인증시험 공부자료 하시는 일에서 한층 더 업그레이드될 것이고 생활에서도 분명히 많은 도움이 될 것입니다, Itexamdump에서 제공하는Appian ACD301덤프로 시험 준비하세요.

자주 그래요, 그렇다면 더더욱 이대로 떠날 수는 없었다, 시험문제커ACD301버율이 높아 덤프에 있는 문제만 조금의 시간의 들여 공부하신다면 누구나 쉽게 시험패스가능합니다, 저희 IT전문가들은 높은 정확도를 보장하는 최고의 품질을 자랑하는 Appian ACD301시험지도서를 발췌하였습니다.이는 실제시험에 대비하여 전문적으로 제작된 시험준비 공부자료로서 높은 적중율을 보장하는 시험준비 필수자료입니다.

완벽한 ACD301인증시험 공부자료 시험덤프문제 다운받기

Itexamdump덤프는 고객님께서 필요한것이 무엇인지 너무나도 잘 알고 있답니다, 하시는 일에서 한층 더 업그레이드될 것이고 생활에서도 분명히 많은 도움이 될 것입니다, Itexamdump에서 제공하는Appian ACD301덤프로 시험 준비하세요.

• ACD301시험대비 덤프 최신문제 🌟 ACD301높은 통과율 시험덤프자료 🌅 ACD301시험대비 덤프 최신문제 👾 무료로 다운로드하려면▶ kr.fast2test.com ◀로 이동하여▶ ACD301 ◀를 검색하십시오ACD301 100％시험패스 덤프문제
• ACD301인증시험 공부자료 덤프문제보기 🔈 “ ACD301 ”를 무료로 다운로드하려면【 www.itdumpskr.com 】웹사이트를 입력하세요ACD301덤프공부자료
• ACD301시험덤프공부 🐂 ACD301적중율 높은 인증덤프 🧢 ACD301덤프공부 🐕 《 www.koreadumps.com 》웹사이트에서（ ACD301 ）를 열고 검색하여 무료 다운로드ACD301최신 시험기출문제
• 100% 유효한 ACD301인증시험 공부자료 공부문제 🆑 ➤ www.itdumpskr.com ⮘에서➥ ACD301 🡄를 검색하고 무료로 다운로드하세요ACD301시험대비 최신 덤프모음집
• 최신버전 ACD301인증시험 공부자료 완벽한 시험공부자료 👊 ⮆ www.itdumpskr.com ⮄에서 검색만 하면▷ ACD301 ◁를 무료로 다운로드할 수 있습니다ACD301최신 인증시험 공부자료
• ACD301최고품질 덤프데모 다운 😭 ACD301최신 업데이트 덤프자료 🌟 ACD301최신 업데이트 덤프자료 💻 지금【 www.itdumpskr.com 】에서☀ ACD301 ️☀️를 검색하고 무료로 다운로드하세요ACD301최신 시험기출문제
• 최신 ACD301인증시험 공부자료 인증공부문제 🏝 시험 자료를 무료로 다운로드하려면（ www.passtip.net ）을 통해“ ACD301 ”를 검색하십시오ACD301최신 인증시험 기출문제
• ACD301시험대비 덤프 최신문제 🟧 ACD301덤프공부 📊 ACD301인증시험 덤프공부 💈 ⇛ www.itdumpskr.com ⇚을 통해 쉽게☀ ACD301 ️☀️무료 다운로드 받기ACD301시험패스 가능 덤프자료
• 최신버전 ACD301인증시험 공부자료 완벽한 시험공부자료 🕣 ▷ www.itdumpskr.com ◁의 무료 다운로드⮆ ACD301 ⮄페이지가 지금 열립니다ACD301최신 인증시험자료
• 100% 유효한 ACD301인증시험 공부자료 공부문제 🧭 지금（ www.itdumpskr.com ）에서✔ ACD301 ️✔️를 검색하고 무료로 다운로드하세요ACD301덤프공부
• ACD301적중율 높은 인증덤프 ❣ ACD301퍼펙트 덤프데모문제 보기 🥉 ACD301최신 시험기출문제 🚹 시험 자료를 무료로 다운로드하려면☀ www.itexamdump.com ️☀️을 통해【 ACD301 】를 검색하십시오ACD301시험패스 가능 덤프자료
• lmsdemo.phlera.com, teachsmart.asia, capacitacion.axiomamexico.com.mx, shortcourses.russellcollege.edu.au, uniway.edu.lk, ncon.edu.sa, shortcourses.russellcollege.edu.au, uniway.edu.lk, daotao.wisebusiness.edu.vn, pct.edu.pk

그 외, Itexamdump ACD301 시험 문제집 일부가 지금은 무료입니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mYEkkNiTatVbP7n4_0uL854II3q7Tqw8